I am working with Mitchell on a claim, and his claim and my
post yesterday got me thinking about claims from the insurance company’s
perspective. By way of some background, in the claim that Mitchell is working
on the supervising adjuster is being very aggressive and demanding to the point
of being insulting and demeaning to both him and the insured. Needless to say
it’s gotten off to a bad start and letters have been flying back and forth. But
still it got me to thinking about what a claim is to an insurance company.
Now a lot of you may be thinking that a claim is an expense
and you’d be right, but I think it’s much more than the money that’s going to
be paid out. It gets back to understanding why people buy insurance in the
first place. Yes, I know you have to buy insurance if you own a car or mortgage
a house, but why purchase from one company as opposed to another? Why do folks
say I’ve got State Farm Insurance or Allstate Insurance as opposed to just
saying I’ve got homeowner’s insurance or auto insurance? I think it’s because
there is a perceived value in the company who sold them the policy and a hope
that value will be expressed at the time the claim is made. So when I think of
claims, I am thinking of opportunity.
A claim is an opportunity from the company’s vantage point
to deliver upon that perceived value. To deliver value in the adjustment, to
deliver value in the evaluation of damages, to deliver value in the payment of
the claim, to deliver value in the relationship that is established between the
parties. However, Mitchell’s experience seems to indicate that the insurance
company doesn’t look at a claim as a way to deliver value. They are just pissed
off at having to pay. In reality what occurred is that the insured is being perceived
by the company as trying to get something they don’t deserve.
And that mindset is a wasted opportunity to deliver on that
perceived value.
Imagine how different the relationship between insurance
company and insured would be if the insurance company fostered and nurtured the
concept that a claim is an opportunity to deliver value in the adjustment
process. Imagine if the adjuster were more concerned with building a
relationship instead of letting the policyholder know what wasn’t covered and
what the insurance company couldn’t do. Imagine if they brought to the table
solutions rather than objections. I think the bottom line would actually
improve. Sure indemnity might increase slightly, but legal and experts expense
would certainly drop.
“Would you like a latte
with that drywall?”
Bill
No comments:
Post a Comment